It's kind of scary how nobody seems to support the court ruling yesterday declaring the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional. And all the major newspapers' editorials (New York Times, Washington Post, LA Times, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Portland Oregonian, San Fransisco Chronicle, San Diego Union-Tribune, Arizona Republic ... I'm forced, for lack of a better option, to applaud the Detroit Free Press for almost opposing it) seem to be using the same logic -- "what's the big deal? The government invokes God all the time." If the government jumped off a bridge all the time, would it be ok?