4.3 million acres
I went to Google to try to find more information about the following interesting facts from a Washington Post letter to the editor:
I figured one way to do it (since the letter didn't say where those facts came from) was to search some of the numbers. So I tried "4.3 million acres." I wasn't able to find the source of the letter's 4.3 million acres, but I did find out that there are 4.3 million acres of (among other things):
4.3 million acres is such a versatile figure. I'll have to remember it in the future.
UPDATE: A more general search for information about proftability of logging public lands has provided plenty of reports that support the letter's general conclusion -- that logging is a money-loser for the National Parks (as well as contributing to fire danger). It looks like the logging industry could use a dose of actual capitalism (i.e. having to make ends meet), rather than continuing to subsist on the public dole.
From 1992 to 2001, 91 national forests had a cash-flow loss of $2.95 billion from logging 4.3 million acres to cut 31.8 billion board feet. That's a loss of $685 an acre.
On the other hand, 17 forests turned a profit of $15 per acre or $1.72 per thousand board feet. While that's not a huge profit, it at least isn't a drain on taxpayers. |
I figured one way to do it (since the letter didn't say where those facts came from) was to search some of the numbers. So I tried "4.3 million acres." I wasn't able to find the source of the letter's 4.3 million acres, but I did find out that there are 4.3 million acres of (among other things):
- Forests that burned prior to August 10 in 2000
- Oregon Wild Roadless areas on US Forest Service Land
- Mulch tilling in North Dakota in 1992
- Durum wheat expected in 1999
- Estuarine wetlands in the mid-1980s
4.3 million acres is such a versatile figure. I'll have to remember it in the future.
UPDATE: A more general search for information about proftability of logging public lands has provided plenty of reports that support the letter's general conclusion -- that logging is a money-loser for the National Parks (as well as contributing to fire danger). It looks like the logging industry could use a dose of actual capitalism (i.e. having to make ends meet), rather than continuing to subsist on the public dole.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home